5G vs Starlink vs Home Fibre in 2026: Which Internet Technology Wins for Speed, Reliability and Value — Everywhere

The answer most technology reviews give you is: it depends. That answer is correct and completely useless. Of course it depends — the question is what it depends on, specifically, and what the real-world numbers look like for someone in rural North Yorkshire, suburban Houston, or a hillside property outside Santiago de los Caballeros.

In 2026, three distinct internet technologies are genuinely competing for your subscription: full fibre (FTTP), 5G home broadband, and Starlink satellite. Each operates on a fundamentally different physical architecture. Each has a different performance profile that maps differently onto different use cases. And the market has shifted fast enough in the last eighteen months that advice from 2024 — when Starlink was still a single residential tier, when UK full fibre was at 56% coverage, and when 5G home broadband was niche — is already out of date.

This guide uses the most current independent testing data available — Opensignal, Ookla, Ookla's Speedtest Global Index, and verified user performance reports — to give you a technology-specific, geography-specific, use-case-specific answer. No hedging.

1. Real-World Speed Tests: 5G, Starlink and Gigabit Fibre in 2026

The first thing to understand is that marketed speeds and real-world speeds are different things, and that real-world speeds vary significantly by technology, location, and time of day. Here is what independent measurement data actually shows.

Full Fibre (FTTP): The Ceiling Is Genuinely High

Fibre-to-the-Premises — where a fibre optic cable runs directly to your home rather than to a street cabinet — is the only technology in this comparison where the marketed speed is reliably close to the experienced speed. Unlike 5G (which is shared spectrum) or Starlink (which involves orbital signal propagation), FTTP provides a dedicated, physical connection whose speed degrades only negligibly with distance and not at all with network congestion at the consumer level.

In the UK, gigabit FTTP packages (1 Gbps download) are widely available from BT/EE, Sky, Vodafone, Virgin Media, and alternative network providers including CityFibre and Hyperoptic. The average monthly cost of an ultrafast (900 Mbps+) connection is £31.49 as of May 2026, according to MoneySuperMarket's live comparison data. Full fibre packages at 150–500 Mbps range from £32–£50 per month. Entry-level FTTP at 100–150 Mbps starts at around £18–£25 from competitive providers including Vodafone's 150 Mbps package on the combined Openreach/CityFibre network.

In the US, fibre options from providers including AT&T Fiber, Google Fiber, Ziply, and local providers deliver 1 Gbps symmetrical (equal upload and download) for $60–$80 per month in covered areas, with multi-gigabit tiers (2 Gbps+) available from around $90. Crucially, upload speeds on fibre are symmetrical — 1 Gbps up as well as down — while every other technology in this comparison delivers significantly asymmetric upload performance.

Real-world FTTP latency: 5–15 ms. Real-world download speed on a 1 Gbps plan: typically 850–950 Mbps wired, 400–600 Mbps over Wi-Fi 6 depending on router and home environment.

5G Home Broadband: Strong in Cities, Inconsistent Everywhere Else

5G fixed wireless access (5G FWA) — a home broadband service delivered over the 5G mobile network to a dedicated indoor or outdoor router — has matured rapidly. In the UK, the January 2026 Opensignal report measured average 5G download speeds ranging from 89.9 Mbps on O2 to 187 Mbps on Three and 187 Mbps on EE. RootMetrics' H2 2025 testing recorded median 5G speeds from 111 Mbps (O2) to 236.7 Mbps (EE) across UK networks. Peak speeds in optimal urban conditions exceed 500 Mbps; the record across all UK networks in independent testing is 886.6 Mbps on Three.

In the US, 5G home broadband from T-Mobile and Verizon delivers typical download speeds of 100–300 Mbps in well-covered areas, with users in densely covered suburban zones regularly seeing 400 Mbps+ on mmWave deployments near towers. However, US 5G home broadband performance degrades sharply with distance from masts and in areas served by sub-6 GHz spectrum rather than mmWave.

The key caveat: real-world 5G broadband performance is highly location-dependent in ways that neither the coverage maps nor the headline speed figures reveal. Opensignal's analysis found that only approximately 45–50% of UK premises can maintain above 50 Mbps sustained 5G speeds during peak hours — the metric that most accurately reflects practical consumer experience. High-rise buildings, dense urban environments, and anything beyond a kilometre or two from a 5G mast can reduce performance dramatically.

Real-world 5G broadband latency: 20–48 ms (Opensignal UK average: 35–48 ms). Upload speeds: 11–40 Mbps depending on network and location.

Starlink Residential: Consistent for What It Is

As of January 2026, Starlink restructured its US residential plans into three tiers: Residential 100 Mbps ($50/month, speed-capped), Residential 200 Mbps ($90/month, formerly Residential Lite), and Residential Max ($120/month, for maximum allocated speeds). Hardware cost for the Standard Kit remains approximately $599 in the US.

Ookla's Speedtest Global Index places Starlink's median US download speed at 65–100 Mbps through late 2025 into 2026 — making it decisively the fastest satellite internet provider available, at three to five times the speed of HughesNet or Viasat. However, this median figure conceals meaningful variation: approximately 80% of Starlink users pull speeds above 40 Mbps most of the time, and about half regularly clear 80 Mbps. Users in lower-congestion rural areas often experience better-than-average speeds precisely because fewer users share the same orbital capacity. Urban Starlink deployments, by contrast, tend to underperform the residential median because satellite capacity is shared across a larger user density.

Upload speeds are Starlink's most significant limitation: 10–20 Mbps on residential plans, which handles video calls and standard cloud sync but is noticeably constrictive for large file uploads, content creation workflows, or anything requiring symmetric throughput.

Real-world Starlink latency: 20–50 ms on residential plans, with occasional spikes to 80–100 ms during satellite handoffs or poor weather. The Gen 3 hardware platform is designed to handle future network capacity upgrades as SpaceX continues constellation densification — meaning today's tested speeds are the floor, not the ceiling.

"Starlink is the best satellite internet you can buy today, and nothing else is even in the same zip code. But the question isn't whether it beats HughesNet — it's whether it beats the fibre or 5G option available at your specific address. And in most urban and suburban locations where those alternatives exist, it doesn't."

— US Mobile Starlink Review, April 2026

2. Latency Comparison: Why This Matters More Than Download Speed for Most Uses

For the majority of everyday internet use — video calls, gaming, streaming, web browsing, smart home operation — latency is more impactful than raw download speed. The reason most people do not feel this is that their current connection is adequate for both, and the gap only becomes apparent when one metric is significantly limited. That gap becomes starkly visible when comparing these three technologies.

What Latency Actually Measures

Latency — typically measured in milliseconds (ms) as "ping" — is the time it takes for a data packet to travel from your device to a server and back. Low latency means near-instantaneous responsiveness; high latency means the connection feels "laggy" regardless of how fast the download pipe is. Downloading a large file at 50 Mbps is about bandwidth; whether your video call feels natural, whether your mouse cursor responds immediately in a cloud application, whether your game registers hits accurately — all of those are about latency.

The Three Technologies Compared

• Full fibre FTTP: 1–15 ms. Light pulses travelling through glass fibre move at close to the speed of light with minimal processing delay. This is the gold standard for any latency-sensitive application. A competitive esports player needs below 15 ms for genuine competitive viability in titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2. FTTP is the only consumer technology that reliably delivers this. Cloud gaming, real-time financial applications, and remote surgical or industrial operations all require FTTP-class latency.

• 5G: 20–48 ms. Opensignal's UK measurements place the average 5G latency at 35–48 ms — a meaningful improvement over 4G (55–62 ms) but nowhere near fibre. The 36 ms gap between 5G and FTTP latency is decisive in competitive multiplayer gaming, perceptible in video call quality under poor network conditions, and noticeable in cloud-streamed desktop applications. For casual gaming, streaming, and standard video calls on stable 5G signal, latency is entirely adequate. For competitive gaming, content creation, or remote desktop work, it is not.

• Starlink: 20–50 ms (residential), with handoff spikes. Starlink's low-earth orbit architecture dramatically reduced satellite latency from the 600–700 ms of traditional geostationary systems. The 20–50 ms range makes Starlink viable for video calls, casual gaming, and streaming — none of which are applications that most residential satellite users would have considered possible five years ago. However, Starlink's latency is not consistent: the satellite handoff process — where your dish switches from one passing satellite to the next every few minutes — produces brief latency spikes of 80–100 ms that are largely invisible in video streaming (which buffers) but are noticeable during live calls and disruptive in fast-paced gaming. Weather events can push latency above 100 ms for sustained periods.

The Latency Decision Matrix

• Competitive online gaming (Valorant, CS2, Apex): FTTP only. 5G marginal; Starlink not viable.

• Casual online gaming (story games, turn-based, couch co-op): All three are adequate. Starlink and 5G work fine.

• Video calls (Zoom, Teams, FaceTime — professional quality): FTTP best; 5G and Starlink both workable on stable signal with good weather. Starlink can degrade in bad weather.

• 4K streaming (Netflix, Disney+, YouTube): All three are adequate. This is primarily a bandwidth question, not latency.

• Cloud gaming (Xbox Cloud Gaming, GeForce NOW): FTTP strongly recommended; 5G marginal in good conditions; Starlink not recommended.

• Smart home operation (20+ connected devices): FTTP handles this without perceptible impact. 5G and Starlink degrade as device count increases and latency-sensitive IoT traffic competes with other use.

3. Starlink in the Dominican Republic: Availability, Pricing and Performance

The Dominican Republic was the first Caribbean country to receive Starlink service — access opened in 2022 after President Luis Abinader announced the partnership at the Americas Summit in Los Angeles. Today, Starlink is available across the DR and represents the most significant change to the country's internet landscape in a generation, particularly for rural and semi-rural users who have historically been underserved by terrestrial broadband infrastructure.

Coverage and Availability in 2026

Starlink coverage in the Dominican Republic is available across the territory. The original launch indicated a waitlist for Greater Santo Domingo — reflecting the higher user density in the capital — but service in secondary cities, coastal resort areas, rural agricultural regions, and mountainous provinces such as the Cordillera Central is now live and available without a waitlist in most locations. The DR is served by the same constellation of LEO satellites covering the broader Caribbean, meaning that a user in the Cibao Valley or on the Samaná Peninsula can access the same service architecture as a user in North Carolina or Devon.

This is genuinely transformative for specific populations: rural businesses, agricultural operations, telecommuters in non-urban areas, and the growing remote-work expat community concentrated along the north coast and in mountain communities all now have access to internet infrastructure that was functionally unavailable to them three years ago. The service also provides resilience that ground-based infrastructure cannot — a hurricane that takes out local cell towers and cable infrastructure does not affect Starlink service as long as the dish is undamaged and has power.

Pricing in the Dominican Republic

Starlink pricing in the DR has shifted significantly since the 2022 launch. Current pricing (as of May 2026) is structured as follows:

• Standard Kit hardware: Approximately RD$27,000–38,900 one-time (roughly $450–$650 USD depending on exchange rate and kit tier), or approximately $599 USD ordered directly from starlink.com.

• Residential monthly service: The current Dominican-market price is approximately RD$2,900–7,080 per month depending on plan tier — representing a significant reduction from the original launch pricing and reflecting Starlink's stated goal of broadening affordability. At the lower tier, this is approximately $50–55 USD per month at current exchange rates.

• Starlink Roam (mobile/travel use): Available for users who need connectivity across multiple locations — relevant for businesses operating across the DR, travelling between resorts, or mobile operations including boats and vehicles.

Compared to fixed alternatives available in urban DR — Claro, Altice, and Wind Telecom offer cable and fibre plans in Santo Domingo and major cities at prices ranging from RD$1,200 to RD$4,000 per month for 50–100 Mbps service — Starlink's residential tier is more expensive on a monthly basis but serves areas where those fixed alternatives do not exist. For a rural business or a home in a province without cable infrastructure, Starlink's price comparison point is the local mobile data connection, against which Starlink delivers dramatically higher performance at a comparable cost.

Real-World Performance in the Caribbean

Starlink performance in the Dominican Republic broadly mirrors the global residential median: 50–150 Mbps download, 10–20 Mbps upload, 20–50 ms latency under normal conditions. Users in lower-density rural areas typically see the upper end of this range. Users in Santo Domingo and Santiago, where more subscribers share the same orbital capacity, report performance closer to the 50–80 Mbps range during peak hours.

Weather is the most significant operational consideration specific to the Caribbean. The Dominican Republic's hurricane season (June through November) and year-round afternoon thunderstorms can cause temporary degradation during heavy rainfall. Signal attenuation during the heaviest tropical downpours can reduce speeds to 20–40 Mbps and temporarily increase latency. This is the same phenomenon globally but more frequent and more intense in a tropical climate than in temperate latitudes. For most use cases — including remote work, video streaming, and communication — these interruptions are brief and tolerable. For time-critical real-time applications (live trading, surgery, high-stakes conferencing), it is a genuine limitation to plan around.

Tree coverage is the other DR-specific consideration. Starlink requires a clear sky view of approximately 100 degrees elevation angle. Properties in forested mountain areas or with mature tropical tree canopy may need to mount the dish on a tall pole or rooftop to clear obstructions. The Starlink app's sky obstruction checker is an essential pre-installation tool.

4. Who Each Technology Is Actually Right For — Use Case Matching

The honest answer to "which internet is best" is a routing table, not a single recommendation. Here is the complete map.

Full Fibre (FTTP) Is Right For You If:

• You live in an urban or suburban area where it is available. In 2026, full fibre covers approximately 60%+ of UK premises and is expanding at pace via Openreach and alternative networks including CityFibre, nexfibre, and Gigaclear. In the US, fibre availability is patchier but growing rapidly in cities and larger suburbs. Check your address at Openreach's fibre checker (UK) or broadbandnow.com (US) before considering alternatives.

• You work from home and upload large files, run video calls professionally, or access remote desktops. Symmetrical gigabit upload (or even 100 Mbps upload) transforms workflows that involve cloud storage, video production, software development, or enterprise applications. No other technology in this comparison offers comparable upload performance.

• You have multiple heavy users in one household. Four people simultaneously streaming 4K, gaming, and video calling will consume 200+ Mbps of simultaneous bandwidth. Fibre handles this without degradation. 5G and Starlink both show performance reduction under multi-user peak load.

• Long-term value is a priority. Fibre has essentially no hardware costs (the router is typically provided by the ISP), no degradation with bad weather, and scales — if you upgrade your plan, the cable that already runs to your house can carry multi-gigabit speeds without any infrastructure change.

5G Home Broadband Is Right For You If:

• You live in a well-covered urban or suburban area but cannot access fibre. In areas where FTTP has not yet reached but 5G signal is strong, 5G broadband is the best available option. UK providers Three, EE, and Vodafone all offer plug-in routers that are live within minutes — no installation appointment needed, no engineer, no contract (some providers offer rolling monthly deals).

• You are renting and cannot get a fibre line installed, or need a temporary connection. 5G home broadband routers plug in like any appliance. No openreach appointment, no landlord permission for physical installation, no 24-month contract required from all providers. This is the technology's defining practical advantage over FTTP.

• You move frequently. A 5G router goes in a bag. Starlink ships a dish that needs reinstalling and potentially registering at a new service location. Fibre is tied to your address.

• Your budget is tight and you live in a well-covered area. UK 5G home broadband plans from Three, Sky, and others start at £20–£25 per month with no hardware cost. That is meaningfully cheaper than FTTP at comparable (or in some cases faster) speeds on a good 5G signal.

Starlink Is Right For You If:

• You live in a rural or remote area where fibre does not reach and 5G signal is poor or absent. This is Starlink's defining use case and the one where it has no serious competition. A farmhouse in the Scottish Highlands, a ranching property in rural Montana, a mountain home in the Cordillera Central — all of these can now have 100+ Mbps broadband. That was not true three years ago.

• You are in the Dominican Republic or Caribbean and outside major urban centres. For DR residents in areas where only slow mobile data has historically been available, Starlink's 50–150 Mbps at $50–$60 per month is a transformative upgrade, not a compromise.

• You need portable or mobile connectivity. Starlink Roam allows the dish to be used across the coverage footprint — on boats, at campsites, at a second property, or while travelling. No other consumer broadband technology offers this.

• Resilience is a priority. Where natural disasters, hurricanes, or infrastructure damage is a realistic risk, Starlink's independence from terrestrial infrastructure is a meaningful operational advantage. It kept connectivity online for users in areas of the US affected by 2024–2025 storm damage where both fibre and mobile networks went down.

• You are a digital nomad or running a remote business that needs connectivity independent of local infrastructure quality. A tourist accommodation operation in a rural DR province or a small eco-resort with no cable access can now offer its guests the same streaming and working connectivity available in a Santo Domingo hotel.

5. Total Cost of Ownership Over 3 Years Including Hardware and Service

Monthly pricing comparisons miss the picture when hardware costs and contract terms differ significantly between technologies. Here is the honest three-year total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison across all three, in both US and UK markets.

United States — 3-Year TCO

• Gigabit FTTP (AT&T/Google Fiber/Ziply — typical urban pricing): Hardware: $0–$10/month router lease, or $100–$200 one-time own router cost. Service: $65–$80/month. 3-year total: approximately $2,440–$3,080 (hardware included, first year typically promotional). No contract required on most providers. No weather degradation. Symmetrical speeds.

• 5G Home Broadband (T-Mobile Home Internet/Verizon 5G Home): Hardware: $0 with service activation (router included). Service: $50–$70/month, typically $25–$35 for existing mobile customers on bundled plans. 3-year total: approximately $900–$2,520, with bundle discounts at the lower end. No contract; cancel monthly. Performance variable by location.

• Starlink Residential (Residential 200 Mbps plan): Hardware: $599 standard kit (one-time). Service: $90/month (Residential 200 Mbps). 3-year total: approximately $3,839. The $50/month Residential 100 Mbps plan brings 3-year TCO to $2,399 — competitive with FTTP in areas where FTTP simply does not exist. No early termination fee; cancel monthly.

United Kingdom — 3-Year TCO

• Gigabit FTTP (BT/EE, Sky, Vodafone — typical 900+ Mbps plan): Hardware: router typically included free. Service: £31–£45/month average for gigabit tier; standard full fibre at 150–500 Mbps runs £32–£50/month. Annual April price increases (+£3–£4/month from April 2026 for major providers). 3-year total on a gigabit plan: approximately £1,200–£1,700 (allowing for one price rise cycle). Note: giffgaff introduced a 2026 price lock on rolling monthly full fibre plans — a standout option for cost-conscious users.

• 5G Home Broadband (Three, Sky, EE — typical plans): Hardware: router included, £0 upfront. Service: £20–£35/month. Some providers offer 30-day rolling contracts. 3-year total: approximately £720–£1,260. This is the lowest TCO of the three for well-covered UK urban and suburban users. Social tariffs for Universal Credit/PIP claimants from £12–£20/month reduce this further.

• Starlink Residential (UK pricing): Hardware: £299–£499 for the standard kit (regional pricing). Service: approximately £75/month for the standard residential plan in the UK. 3-year total: approximately £3,000–£3,200. This is significantly more expensive than FTTP in areas where FTTP is available. Where it is not available — rural Scotland, remote Wales, coastal communities not served by Openreach's fibre rollout — it is the only option offering this performance level, and the comparison point is a slow ADSL or FTTC connection or no fixed broadband at all.

Dominican Republic — 3-Year TCO

• Urban fixed broadband (Claro/Altice — Santo Domingo, Santiago): Service: approximately RD$1,500–4,000/month for 50–200 Mbps. 3-year total: approximately RD$54,000–$144,000 (roughly $900–$2,400 USD). Available only in major urban centres and expanding towns.

• Starlink Residential (DR pricing): Hardware: approximately RD$27,000–38,900 (one-time). Service: approximately RD$2,900–7,080/month depending on plan. 3-year total on the lower-tier plan: approximately RD$131,400 (roughly $2,200 USD). On the higher tier: approximately RD$292,680 (~$4,900 USD). For areas without fixed broadband alternatives, this is not a premium — it is the only viable service. For urban users with access to good fixed broadband, Starlink is meaningfully more expensive.

• 5G mobile broadband (Claro/Altice/Viva — data plans): Available in major cities as mobile data, not typically marketed as home broadband FWA. Coverage in rural areas remains limited. Not a like-for-like comparison with the fixed technologies above for household use.

The Three-Year Decision Framework

The summary cost picture resolves into a clear decision tree:

• Fibre available at your address? Use it. It is the cheapest, fastest, lowest-latency, and most reliable option at every comparable price point in both the UK and US.

• Fibre not available but strong 5G signal? Use 5G home broadband. It is significantly cheaper than Starlink, requires no hardware investment, and delivers adequate speed for all mainstream household uses except competitive gaming at the highest level.

• No fibre, no reliable 5G? Starlink. Accept the hardware cost as a one-time infrastructure investment rather than an ongoing expense — amortised over three years, it is approximately $15–20/month of the total cost. There is no alternative that delivers comparable performance in rural and underserved locations.

"In most performance metrics, fiber still leads — yet Starlink opens real broadband options where cables do not reach. The honest answer is that location determines the correct technology more than any other variable. The technology pecking order matters only after geography has been factored in."

— TechTimes Starlink vs Fiber comparison, January 2026

The Technology That Wins in 2026 — By Location

The winner is different for every address. Here is the complete verdict.

Urban UK and US (fibre available)

Winner: Full Fibre. Cheaper than Starlink over three years, faster than 5G in peak conditions, lowest latency of the three, symmetric upload, and no weather dependency. The only reason to choose 5G over fibre in an urban area is if you rent and cannot arrange installation, or if you need a portable connection. The only reason to choose Starlink over either is resilience testing or specific business redundancy requirements.

Suburban UK and US (fibre not yet rolled out, 5G signal present)

Winner: 5G. Faster to set up, cheaper per month, no hardware cost. Performance is adequate for all mainstream household uses. Watch your 5G coverage map carefully — if your property is at the edge of a cell, consider whether the measured speed at your specific address (using a signal checker or trial period) warrants the lower cost versus Starlink's more predictable per-location performance.

Rural UK and US (no fibre, poor 5G)

Winner: Starlink. No contest. The hardware cost is the price of rural connectivity. Accept it as an infrastructure investment. The performance at 50–150 Mbps far exceeds what ADSL, FTTC, or 4G can deliver in these locations, and the installation is faster than waiting for a fibre rollout that may be years away.

Dominican Republic — Urban

Winner: Fixed broadband (Claro/Altice FTTP or cable) where available. More affordable than Starlink on a monthly and three-year basis, and increasingly delivering competitive speeds in Santo Domingo and Santiago. Starlink makes sense as a secondary connection for outage resilience or for a home office requiring guaranteed performance through hurricane season.

Dominican Republic — Rural, Coastal, and Mountain Regions

Winner: Starlink, decisively. This is precisely the use case the technology was built for. A business on the Samaná Peninsula, a farm in the Cordillera Central, a resort outside Cabarete, a home in a mountain community without cable infrastructure — all of these now have access to genuine broadband for the first time, at a price that is high by local standards but entirely reasonable by international ones. The transformative impact on rural Dominican connectivity is the most significant technology story in the country's internet history since mobile phones arrived.

Key Takeaways

• Full fibre (FTTP) delivers the best combination of speed, latency, reliability, and long-term cost where available. Gigabit plans average £31.49/month in the UK and $65–80/month in the US, with 5–15 ms latency.

• 5G home broadband ranges from 90–237 Mbps (UK) with 35–48 ms latency. It is the cheapest option per month, requires no hardware investment, and is the right choice when fibre is unavailable and 5G signal is strong.

• Starlink's 2026 residential plans (100/200 Mbps/$50–$90 per month in the US) deliver 65–100 Mbps median with 20–50 ms latency. It is unmatched for rural and remote locations where terrestrial alternatives do not reach.

• Latency matters more than download speed for gaming, video calls, and real-time applications. Fibre (1–15 ms) is the only option viable for competitive gaming. 5G (35–48 ms) and Starlink (20–50 ms) are adequate for all mainstream uses.

• Starlink is available across the Dominican Republic, including rural areas, at approximately RD$2,900–7,080/month plus RD$27,000–38,900 hardware. For users outside urban fibre coverage, it is transformative.

• Three-year TCO: 5G is cheapest in well-covered areas (UK: £720–£1,260; US: $900–$2,520 with bundle). Fibre is next (UK: £1,200–£1,700; US: $2,440–$3,080). Starlink is most expensive (UK: £3,000+; US: $2,400–$3,840) but is the only viable option for the locations it serves.

Speed and latency data sourced from Opensignal's January 2026 UK 5G report, Ookla Speedtest Global Index (late 2025–2026), RootMetrics H2 2025 network testing, US Mobile Starlink independent review (April 2026), MoneySuperMarket May 2026 fibre pricing data, and Starlink's published plan pricing as of January–May 2026. All pricing is correct at time of writing and subject to change. Check current availability and pricing at Starlink.com, your network provider's website, and uswitch.com/broadband (UK) or broadbandnow.com (US) for the most current deals at your specific address.